Consumer Group Seeks Tweaks to Proposed Robotext Rules
The National Consumer Law Center asked the FCC to tweak language in a draft robotexting order and Further NPRM (see 2302230059) to make clear that the FCC determined in 2003 “that texts are calls for purposes of the Telephone Consumer…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
Protection Act,1 that it specifically applied the Do Not Call regulations to wireless telephone numbers in 47 C.F.R 64.1200(e), and that numerous courts have applied the Do Not Call rules to texts.” The center urged the FCC to change the words “extending,” “extend” and “extension” for application of the do not call registry to “clarifying,” “clarify” and “clarification,” in a filing posted Wednesday in docket 21-402.