NetChoice Consents to Magistrate Judge in AB-2273 Case; Calif. AG Declines
Plaintiff NetChoice consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction in its lawsuit against California Attorney General Rob Bonta (D), but Bonta declined, said their filings Wednesday (NetChoice's and Bonta's) in U.S. District Court for Northern California in San Jose (docket 5:22-cv-08861). California’s…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
age-appropriate social media design law violates the First Amendment by telling sites how to “manage constitutionally protected speech,” NetChoice alleged Dec. 14 in a complaint seeking to invalidate AB-2273 (see 2212140063). An initial case management conference in the dispute is scheduled for March 14, said a Dec. 15 order.