NetChoice v. Bonta Parties to Consent to or Decline Magistrate Judge
The U.S. District Court for Northern California in San Jose gave both sides in NetChoice’s lawsuit against California Attorney General Rob Bonta (D) a Jan. 4 deadline for consenting or declining to proceed before a magistrate judge, said a clerk’s…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
text-only notice in docket 5:22-cv-08861. California’s age-appropriate social media design law violates the First Amendment by telling sites how to “manage constitutionally protected speech,” NetChoice alleged Dec. 14 in a complaint that seeks to invalidate AB-2273 (see 2212140063). The tech group drew comparisons to its free speech challenges against social media content moderation laws in Texas and Florida.