CIT Denies 2 Challenges Over On-Site Verification for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies
The Court of International Trade in a Nov. 8 opinion denied a motion for judgment from plaintiffs, led by Ellwood City Forge Co., in a case challenging the Commerce Department's antidumping duty investigation into forged steel fluid end blocks from Germany. The plaintiffs challenged Commerce's decision to use verification in lieu of on-site verification. Judge Stephen Vaden ruled that Ellwood City failed to exhaust its administrative remedies over this challenge, thus denying Ellwood City's motion.
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
In a second opinion issued Nov. 8, Vaden made a nearly-identical ruling in a similar case brought Ellwood City. The judge denied the plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration after the court previously rejected the plaintiffs' challenge to the use of questionnaires instead of on-site verification. Vaden again cited Ellwood City's failure to exhaust administrative remedies.