Trade-Related Court Cases Filed Aug. 1-7
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of Aug. 1-7:
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
Grupo Acerero S.A. de C.V., challenging the Commerce Department's final results in the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on steel concrete reinforcing bar from Mexico, covering entries in 2019-2020. #22-00230. Filed Aug. 1.
Risen Energy Co., Ltd., challenging the Commerce Department's final results in the administrative review of the countervailing duty order on crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into modules, covering entries in 2019. #22-00231. Filed Aug. 3.
JA Solar Technology Yangzhou Co., Ltd, Shanghai JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd., JA Solar Co., Ltd. (a.k.a. JingAo Solar Co., Ltd.) and JA Solar (Xingtai) Co., Ltd., challenging the Commerce Department's final results in the administrative review of the countervailing duty order on crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into modules, covering entries in 2019. #22-00232. Filed Aug. 5.
MTD Consumer Group, challenging CBP's denial of its protest claiming its terrain vehicles liquidated by CBP under subheading 8704.31.0020 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the U.S. (25%) should instead be classified under subheading 8703.21.0150 (2.5%). #22-00233. Filed Aug. 5.
Appeals of CIT Decisions
The following appeals of Court of International Trade decisions were filed at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit during the week of Aug. 1-7:
U.S. Steel Corp., challenging a May CIT decision sustaining the Commerce Department's final results in the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on hot-rolled steel from Australia. #22-2078. Opened Aug. 1.
Rimco Inc., challenging a July CIT decision dismissing Rimco's challenge to CBP's assessment of countervailing and antidumping duties on steel wheels from China for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. #22-2079. Opened Aug. 1.
Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. and Gulf Coast Express Pipeline, LLC, challenging a July CIT decision dismissing a case seeking Section 232 steel and aluminum tariff exclusions. #22-2097. Opened Aug. 3.