Importer Sues at Trade Court Over Classification of Offroad Vehicles
Offroad utility vehicles should be classified as passenger rather than cargo transporters, importer MTD said in an Aug. 5 complaint to the Court of International Trade (MTD Consumer Group Inc. v. U.S., CIT # 22-00233).
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
MTD said entries for six of its recreational off-highway vehicles (ROVs) were incorrectly classified by CBP as "motor vehicles for the transport of goods" under heading 8704 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the U.S. The correct classification, MTD said, is under heading 8703 as “[m]otor cars and other motor vehicles principally designed for the transport of persons (other than those of 8702), including station wagons and racing cars.”
MTD is seeking a refund of all duties, which it says were incorrectly assessed, plus interest, arguing that the classification goes against several customs rulings "classifying virtually identical ROVs under Heading 8703, HTSUS" and court rulings that "a vehicle’s intended persons must outweigh an intended purpose of transporting goods." MTD also cited various design features and marketing that point to the vehicles primary purpose as recreational passenger vehicles.
"CBP’s liquidation or reliquidation of the subject entries under Heading 8704, ... had the effect of revoking or modifying CBP’s longstanding UTV rulings," MTD said. "Thus, CBP’s failure to publish notice of the decisions ... was in violation of Section 1625 and the liquidations were contrary to law."