Trade-Related Court Cases Filed March 28 - April 3
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of March 28 - April 3:
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
Blockstream Services USA Inc., challenging CBP's denial of its protest claiming its cryptocurrency miners of Harmonized Tariff Schedule subheading 8543.70.9960, dutiable at 2.6%, are properly classified under subheading 8471.50.0150, free of duty. #22-00101. Filed March 30.
Mitsubishi Power Americas, Inc., challenging CBP's denial of its protest claiming its supported SCR Catalysts qualify for Section 301 duty exclusions under Harmonized Tariff Schedule secondary subheadings 9903.88.46 and 9903.88.56. #22-00102. Filed April 1.
Another three lawsuits were filed at the CIT to challenge lists 3 and 4A Section 301 tariffs on products from China (see 2009220029). For a full list, see the Pacer database.
Appeals of CIT Decisions
No appeals of Court of International Trade decisions were filed at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit during the week of March 28 - April 3.