M&A Injunctions ‘Surest Way to Preserve Competition’: Kanter
DOJ Antitrust Division Chief Jonathan Kanter worries that “merger remedies short of blocking a transaction too often miss the mark,” he told the New York State Bar Association virtually Monday. “Complex settlements, whether behavioral or structural, suffer from significant deficiencies.”…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
When the Antitrust Division decides a deal is likely to lessen competition, “in most situations we should seek a simple injunction to block the transaction,” he said. “It is the surest way to preserve competition.” DOJ must give “full weight to the benefits of preserving competition that already exists in a market, rather than predicting whether a divestiture will actually serve to keep a market competitive,” said Kanter. “That will often mean that we cannot accept anything less than an injunction blocking the merger.” His division “will pursue remedies that are forward-looking in nature, especially in dynamic markets,” he said. “We will pursue remedies -- not settlements. We cannot compromise if there is a violation of the law.”