Trade-Related Court Cases Filed Oct. 25-31
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of Oct. 25-31:
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
Shamrock Building Materials, Inc., challenging CBP's denial of its protest claiming its electrical metallic tubing finished conduit and intermediate metal conduit of Harmonized Tariff Schedule subheading 7306.30.1000 or 7306.30.5028, dutiable at 25%, should be classified under HTS subheading 8547.90.0020, duty-free. #21-00571. Filed Oct. 25.
Mitsubishi Power Americas, Inc., challenging CBP's denial of its protest claiming its supported selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalysts qualify for Section 301 exclusions under Harmonized Tariff Schedule secondary subheadings 9903.88.46 and 9903.88.56. #21-00573. Filed Oct. 29.
Nagase & Co., Ltd., challenging the Commerce Department's final results in the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on glycine from Japan. #21-00574. Filed Oct. 29.
Another lawsuit was filed at the CIT during the week of Oct. 25-31 to challenge lists 3 and 4A Section 301 tariffs on products from China (see 2009220029). For a full list, see the Pacer database.
Appeals of CIT Decisions
No appeals of Court of International Trade decisions were filed at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit during the week of Oct. 25-31.