Trade Law Daily is a Warren News publication.

Trade-Related Court Cases Filed Aug. 23-29

The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of Aug. 23-29:

Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article

Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.

Industrials Negromex, S.A. de C.V., and Dynasol, LLC, challenging the Commerce Department's final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on emulsion styrene-butadiene rubber from Mexico covering entries from 2018 to 2019. #21-00495. Filed Aug. 24.

K-Swiss Inc., challenging lists 3 and 4A Section 301 tariffs on products from China. #21-00497. Filed Aug. 27.

Another four lawsuits were filed at the CIT during the week of Aug. 23-29 to challenge lists 3 and 4A Section 301 tariffs on products from China (see 2009220029). For a full list, see the Pacer database.

Appeals of CIT Decisions

The following appeals of Court of International Trade decisions were filed at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit for the week of Aug. 23-29:

United States, appealing a July 21 CIT decision sustaining Commerce's remand results concluding that Shelter Forest International Acquisition's hardwood plywood from China does not constitute later-developed merchandise circumventing the antidumping and countervailing duty orders. #21-2240. Filed Aug. 25.

United States, appealing a June 10 CIT decision allowing litigation to continue on a case challenging the president's expansion of Section 232 steel and aluminum tariffs onto “derivative” products. #21-2252. Filed Aug. 26.

Zhejiang Machinery Import & Export Corp., appealing a June 23 CIT decision affirming the Commerce Department's remand results that found that Zhejiang failed to show an absence of de facto government control, making it ineligible for a separate rate in the antidumping duty review of tapered roller bearings from China. #21-2257. Filed Aug. 27.