Replies Oppose FCC ORAN Rules
Industry commenters said the FCC should avoid rules for open radio access networks, in replies due Friday on a notice of inquiry in docket 21-63. “The FCC should not put itself in a position where it is picking winners and…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
losers,” the Telecommunications Industry Association said. CTIA opposed rules: “The imperative of network security and reliability is another compelling reason that the Commission should allow providers to deploy Open RAN at the time and manner that they believe meets the requirements of their networks.” T-Mobile said the FCC doesn’t need to act to promote ORAN. While ORAN “may show promise, it is not yet ready for broad deployment,” the carrier said. Push for “common specifications,” “allowing service providers to choose from a growing global ecosystem,” and “facilitate demonstration beds and innovation zones,” Nokia asked. Don't favor U.S. ORAN suppliers, Ericsson said: “Foster a diverse, trusted market.” The Open RAN Policy Coalition said comments show strong interest in ORAN, and artificial intelligence and machine learning will play an important role. Mavenir said the FCC’s program for replacing Chinese gear in networks should accommodate ORAN deployments. “Choice, or the lack thereof, and the present semiconductor shortage warrant an extension of time under the Secure and Trusted Communications Act Reimbursement Program,” Mavenir said.