Trade-Related Court Cases Filed April 5-11
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of April 5-11:
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
Viecura Inc., challenging CBP's denial of its protest claiming that its incontinence fixation pants of subheading 6108.22.9020 qualify for duty-free treatment as articles specially designed or adapted for the use or benefit of the blind or other physically or mentally handicapped persons under secondary subheading 9817.00.96. #21-00154. Filed April 5.
CITIC Dicastal Wheel Manufacturing Co. Ltd., challenging CBP's denial of its protest claiming that its various carts of subheading 8708.70.4545 qualify for Section 301 exclusions under secondary subheading 9903.88.33. #21-00159. Filed April 9.
Another four lawsuits were filed at the CIT during the week of April 5–11 to challenge lists 3 and 4A Section 301 tariffs on products from China (see 2009220029). For a full list, see the Pacer database.
Appeals of CIT Decisions
The following appeals of Court of International Trade decisions were filed at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit during the week of April 5-11:
Venus Wire Industries Pvt. Ltd., Hindustan Inox Ltd., Precision Metals and Sieves Manufacturers (India) Pvt. Ltd., appealing a Jan. 28 CIT decision that sustained the second remand results of the changed circumstances review of the antidumping duty order on stainless steel bar from India. #21-1821. Opened April 5.