Trade-Related Court Cases Filed Aug. 10-16
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of Aug. 10-16:
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
Blockstream USA Corporation., challenging CBP's classification of cryptocurrency miners in subheading 8543.70.9960. #20-00149. Filed Aug. 11.
SeAH Steel Corporation, challenging the Commerce Department’s final results in the 2017-18 administrative review of certain oil country tubular goods from the Republic of Korea. #20-00150. Filed Aug. 12.
Hyundai Steel Company, challenging the Commerce Department’s final results of the second antidumping duty administrative review on certain cold-rolled steel flat products from the Republic of Korea. #20-00151. Filed Aug. 12.
Hyundai Steel Company, challenging the Commerce Department’s final results in “Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017–2018.” #20-00152. Filed Aug. 12.
Colakoglu Dis Ticaret A.S. et al., challenging the Commerce Department’s final results of its administrative review on steel concrete reinforcing bar from Turkey. #20-00153. Filed Aug. 13.
Bral Corporation, challenging CBP's denial of a value adjustment due to defective imported plywood. #20-00154. Filed Aug. 14.
Vietnam Finewood Company Limited et al., challenging CBP's liquidation of its entries subject to a pending scope inquiry and Enforce and Protect Act investigation (see 2007310052). #20-00155. Filed Aug. 14.
Appeals of CIT Decisions
The following appeals of Court of International Trade decisions were filed at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit during the week of Aug. 10-16:
Wirtgen America, Inc. v. U.S., appealing a May 18 CIT decision holding that CBP plays a central role in the Section 337 exclusion order enforcement process and that exclusions may be protestable and challenged at the trade court (see 2005210026). #20-2145. Opened Aug. 10.