Facebook Oversight Board Members Defend Neutrality, Independence
Members of Facebook’s oversight board defended the body Monday as politically neutral and free from undue company influence (see 2005120056). Board members wouldn't have taken the position if they thought they were “providing cover” for Facebook, said University of Oklahoma…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
College of Law professor Evelyn Aswad during an Aspen Institute webcast: The goal is to be as neutral as possible and look at every issue from various angles. Members will be paid, and individual payment amounts aren’t publicly available, said Stanford Law School professor Michael McConnell. Pay is based on what each member could command with alternative use of their time, he noted, saying he expects to spend about 15-20 hours monthly. The board will make binding decisions on content moderation, and can advise on content moderation policies, said Columbia Law School professor Jamal Greene. “We’re not front lines internet cops,” said McConnell, calling it a deliberative body for appeals. Facebook will refer policy questions to the board for nonbinding guidance, McConnell added, noting the company must respond publicly with its decisions on whether it agrees with the guidance. Cato Institute Vice President John Samples said his understanding is that decisions about advertising content will be within the remit of the panel. He called the body an attempt to challenge the content moderation status quo, which people are unhappy with. It’s better than the alternative of having a stronger government role, he said.