9th Circuit Asked to Stay FCC Cable LFA Order Implementation
Plaintiffs appealing the FCC cable TV local franchise authority (LFA) order (see 1911010057) asked the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to stay its implementation. In a docket 19-72219 motion (in Pacer) Monday, Eugene, Oregon, and plaintiffs in three other…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
cases said all petitioners in another three lawsuits also support the motion. They said the agency "drastically and impermissibly reinterpreted key provisions of the Cable Act," affecting how franchises can ensure cable operators meet local needs, which was "a key purpose of the Cable Act." They said it "stretch[es] the meaning of the term 'franchise fee' beyond recognition," leading to budgetary worries for local communities. They said a stay wouldn't hurt cable companies, but implementation would mean "considerable harm" to LFAs and residents. It said respondents the FCC and U.S. and intervenor NCTA oppose the motion. The agency didn't comment Tuesday.