Trade-Related Court Cases Filed Nov. 4-10
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of Nov. 4-10:
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
Vantage Vehicle Group, on the classification of mini trucks. CBP classified the merchandise under subheading 8704.31.0020 (25%). Vantage says it should have instead been classified under subheading 8709.19.0030 (free). #19-00197. Filed Nov. 4.
Royal Brush Manufacturing, challenging a CBP's final determination in an Enforce and Protect Act Investigation that it evaded antidumping duties on cased pencils from China by transshipping the merchandise through the Philippines. #19-00198. Filed Nov. 6.
Target Corporation, on the classification of light emitting diode (LED) lamps. CBP classified the merchandise under subheadings 9405.30 and 9405.40. Target says it should have instead been classified under subheading 8543.70.7100 (2%) or 8539.50.0000 (2%). #19-00199. Filed Nov. 7.
Appeals of CIT Decisions
The following appeals of Court of International Trade decisions were filed at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit during the week of Oct. Nov. 4-10:
ProAmpac Intermediate, Inc., Ampac Holdings, LLC, and Jen-Coat, Inc., challenging the International Trade Commission's final injury determination in the antidumping and countervailing duty investigations on aluminum foil from China. #20-1136. Opened Nov. 8.