States Have Been Given All Relevant Documents, T-Mobile/Sprint Lawyer Says
A lawyer for T-Mobile/Sprint countered state complaints the companies didn’t provide materials on a settlement with DOJ by June 28 (see 1907160068). The state challenge is before U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. “July 2, in…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
response to Plaintiffs’ request, Defendants provided additional information and almost 300 pages of supporting materials that disclosed comprehensive details about a potential DOJ settlement,” Cleary Gottlieb’s David Gelfand wrote (in Pacer) to Judge Robert Lehrburger. “It went far beyond what was contemplated. While Plaintiffs are correct that definitive documents were not provided on July 12, this is only because a final settlement agreement with the DOJ has not yet been reached.”