Trade-Related Court Cases Filed for Week of Jan. 28 - Feb. 3
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of Jan. 28 - Feb. 3:
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
Incipio Technologies, on the classification of wristlets and media player covers. CBP classified the merchandise separately under subheadings 4202.22.1500 (16%) for the wristlets; 3926.10.0000 (5.3%), 4202.92.9060 (17.6%) and 4202.92.9026 (17.6%) for the media player covers; and 8507.60.00 (3.4%) for the power supplies. Incipio says it should have instead been classified under subheadings 4202.32.1000 (4.6% + 12.1¢/kg) for the wristlets, 8473.30.5100 (free) or 3926.10.00 (5.3%) for the media player covers, and 8504.40.85 (free) or 8504.40.95 (1.4%) for the power supplies. #19-00018. Filed Jan. 28.
United States, seeking $364,694.90 in unpaid excise taxes from Kebuth, Inc., Good Times USA LLC and State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. on imports of cigars from the Dominican Republic. #19-00019. Filed Feb. 1.
​Appeals of CIT Decisions
The following appeals of Court of International Trade decisions were filed at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit during the week of Jan 28 - Feb. 3:
Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Limited and dozens of other Chinese companies, appealing a Nov. 26 CIT decision sustaining the final results of the 2013-14 antidumping duty administrative review on wooden bedroom furniture from China. #19-1499, 1500, 1501, 1502 and 1503. Opened Feb. 1.