Hughes Asks FCC to Minimize CAF II Performance Measurements; Others Also Lobby on Auction
Hughes Network Systems urged the FCC to go easy on performance-measurement duties in a planned Connect America Fund Phase II reverse auction of USF support for fixed broadband services in traditional ILEC areas where incumbents declined CAF II offers. Such…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
obligations would impose burdens that fall hardest on smaller winning bidders, said the Hughes response Wednesday to a public notice in docket 10-90 (see 1711060055). The FCC should leverage existing programs, including Measuring Broadband America, but if it does impose a new requirement, it should select a "software approach where the software resides on the operators' modems," said Hughes, which earlier made broader CAF II auction arguments. Several parties lobbied FCC rural broadband auctions task force members in filings this week. The Wireless ISP Association pressed the staffers not to require potential bidders using spectrum to submit propagation maps for the census block groups they're eying. Such applicants should demonstrate due diligence in applications, but the mapping requirement "would be impractical, unfair and inefficient," said WISPA, which also criticized a proposed financial screen and backed census block groups (CBGs) as the geographic bidding unit. A rural coalition of power companies and NTCA urged the FCC to simplify the auction, arguing that procedural complexity, particularly package bidding, could deter small provider participation. But officials from USTelecom, AT&T, CenturyLink, Consolidated Communications, Frontier Communications, Verizon and Windstream defended package bidding, which they said allows participants "to plan efficient network deployment" across CBGs. They said their analysis suggests packages of up to 25 CBGs are "likely to provide sufficient opportunity to reap network build and operating efficiencies to yield bids" consistent with the FCC's goal of ensuring competitive prices and broad coverage. They also said the ability of bidders "to change performance tiers between rounds appeared to contribute more to views that the auction is unnecessarily complex than to the needs of existing broadband providers."