Enforcement Bureau Agrees to Partial Delay in Sprint/Indiana Dispute
Sprint and Indiana shouldn’t get an indefinite delay to filing notices of appearance in their dispute over 800 MHz rebanding costs, the FCC Enforcement Bureau said Monday in docket 02-55 to Chief Administrative Law Judge Richard Sippel. The presiding judge…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
should deny that request and “set a date certain in early January 2018 by which the parties should file their Notices of Appearance, whether filed prior to, or simultaneously with, any settlement agreement reached between the parties,” the bureau said. Sprint and Indiana sought delay because they settled their dispute but need time to document it and seek dismissal (see 1711200049).