Privacy Groups Want Supreme Court to Review Warrantless Cellphone Tracking Case
The Center for Democracy & Technology, Constitution Project and Electronic Frontier Foundation are asking the Supreme Court to review a drug trafficking case in which the 6th U.S. Court of Appeals decided police could track people's cellphones without a warrant.…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
EFF said in a Monday news release the high court should review U.S. v. Rios "and make clear that the Fourth Amendment requires a warrant for real-time location tracking -- whether the tracking occurs via a GPS device on your car or the collection of location data generated by cell phones or other Internet-connected devices." Police did get a warrant to track the defendant's cellphone in the Rios case, but EFF said the 6th Circuit decided a warrant wasn't needed. EFF said the court based its ruling on a "flawed 2012 decision" that said, in an unrelated drug trafficking case, such data doesn't have any privacy protections "because people 'voluntarily' carry cell phones with them." However, EFF said a Florida Supreme Court ruling in a separate case said people do have privacy for cellphone location records.