Cable's Wireless Play Faces Pricing, Quality Hurdles, Macquarie Analyst Says
Consumers generally don't seem interested in wireless offerings from cable operators, Macquarie analyst Amy Yong wrote investors Sunday. Citing a proprietary Macquarie survey of 100 consumers, Yong said 66 expressed disinterest in such an offering. A wireless acquisition is inevitable,…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
she said, with likely scenarios being Verizon/Charter Communications or some T-Mobile combination with cable. Seventy-three percent of those surveyed said the most they would spend for a Comcast- or Charter-branded service was less than their current wireless bill, with 72 percent naming savings as the biggest persuader that could get them to switch from a current provider. Given the Sprint and T-Mobile price wars, Macquarie said, "We believe the barriers to entry remain high for new players." Half said the biggest hurdle to switching to a Comcast- or Charter-branded service is perception of network quality, Macquarie said, calling the Verizon mobile virtual network operator agreements "somewhat of a Catch-22: on the one hand, it will alleviate fears of network quality, but on the other, it would enable a competitor."