Nebraska PSC Could Risk Litigation With USF Revamp, CTIA Warns
The Nebraska Public Service Commission could face a lawsuit if it revamps state USF contribution methodology before the FCC overhauls federal USF contribution formula, CTIA warned in comments Wednesday in PSC docket NUSF-100. The state commission is mulling a move…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
to a connections-based mechanism from the current system based on intrastate revenue. Echoing a call from last month (see 1607190033), CTIA urged the state commission to wait for the FCC: "In addition to avoiding needless legal and practical problems, this approach also will allow the [PSC] to better guard against exacerbating the already high tax, fee, and surcharge burden on Nebraska wireless consumers." Carriers shouldn’t have to make major changes to their billing and accounting systems twice, once for Nebraska contribution overhaul and again after the FCC makes its own changes, CTIA said. “Such a costly and wasteful move could result in litigation.” AT&T is litigating with the Kansas Corporation Commission on these grounds, CTIA said. Federal law says state USF mechanisms mustn't be inconsistent with federal USF's, it said. Wireless contributors allocate intrastate revenue from connections that carry both interstate and intrastate traffic based on the inverse of the factor used for federal USF contributions, based either on a traffic study or the wireless safe harbor, it said. "If Nebraska uses a different approach to assessing interstate-intrastate connections, there is a significant risk that the Nebraska approach could impose NUSF contributions on revenue that is treated as interstate by the FCC.” CenturyLink disagreed. Its comments said "there are no unsurmountable intrastate versus interstate jurisdictional issues raised by moving to a connections-based mechanism for assessing an NUSF surcharge.” Workshops are needed to work out details, but "a connections-based methodology is fundamentally legally sound," the telco said. "An NUSF contribution which is connections-based does not burden the interstate uses any more than a surcharge which is revenues based, since both are determined without regard to jurisdictional separations" and "both recover the same total amount for the fund." Rural independent telcos said the PSC can’t afford to wait for the FCC. The FCC will revamp contribution "at some future point in time, but waiting for the FCC to act at a time when the current NUSF contribution methodology may not be sustainable is not a viable alternative,” rural independents commented. Nebraska is one of several states with decreased revenue to the state USF from contributions (see 1607010010).