Fox News, TVEyes Clash Over Reply Brief Extension Ask
Fox News Network has shown the "extraordinary circumstance" that would warrant more time to file a reply brief in its litigation against TVEyes, though if the court grants that extension, it should give TVEyes more time for its reply brief…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
due Aug. 15 and for filing the deferred appendix, TVEyes said in opposition (in Pacer) filed Thursday in the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Fox in its motion (in Pacer) filed earlier this month sought to move the deadline for its reply in support of its cross-appeal from Aug. 29 to Sept. 15; in it, Fox cited the importance and complexity of the issues in the case, the interests of parity and the summer holiday season. With 13 amicus briefs having been filed in the appeal of a U.S. District Court decision that TVEyes' archiving function is fair use, but emailing, downloading and date/time searches aren't, and with a subsequent injunction (see 1606230036), Fox said, "the parties' appellate briefs are, and necessarily must be, lengthy and unusually meticulous as they parse nuanced issues of copyright law and the technology involved," thus requiring more time. TVEyes in its opposition said none of those cited issues is on par with the "extraordinary circumstances" spelled out in Local Rule 27.1(f). "Most cases to come before this court involve 'important' (and often 'complex') issues with fully developed records," TVEyes said.