ITTA, ACA Propose Disproportionate Share of Regulatory Fees Shift to Wireless Regulatees, CTIA Says
The American Cable Association (ACA) and ITTA proposed again to shift a disproportionate share of regulatory fees onto wireless regulatees and away from wireline interests (see 1512090061), CTIA said in an ex parte letter in docket 15-121. Just because wireless…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
providers also offer voice services, doesn't mean they need to be included in the wireline Interstate Telecommunications Service Providers regulatory fee, the filing said. Despite ACA and ITTA's claims, FCC regulatees don't pay regulatory fees to different bureaus for the same service, CTIA said. The wireless group asked the FCC to reject ITTA and ACA's attempt to change the current regulatory fee methodology for assessing fees on Wireless Telecommunication Bureau and Wireline Competition Bureau regulatees "because it's fair, administrable and consistent with Section 9.”