Trade Law Daily is a Warren News publication.

BIS Announces Proposed Guidance on EAR Enforcement Cases

The Bureau of Industry and Security proposed a new guidance on charging and penalty determinations in settlement of administrative enforcement cases, which would amend Part 766 Supplement No. 1 under the Export Administration Regulations, and will accept public comments on the proposed change until Feb. 26 (here). The proposed changes are meant to make administrative penalties more predictable to the public and aligned with those ordered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control, it said. The guidelines would define factors by which violations could be identified as "egregious" or "non-egregious," and help clarify the base penalty amount likely to apply in an enforcement case. Further, factors would be divided into: (1) "aggravating factors," implying willfulness or recklessness; (2) general factors that could be considered aggravating or mitigating depending on the circumstances, which would look at both the absence or presence and adequacy of an internal compliance program; and (3) "mitigating factors," such as remedial measures taken; and (4) other relevant factors on a case-by-case basis.

Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article

Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.

(Federal Register 12/28/15)