Rural Telcos Target Faster Broadband Speeds as Part of USF Overhaul
Rural telco groups asked the FCC to increase USF broadband speed requirements, with some wrinkles, as part of a planned agency overhaul of high-cost subsidy mechanisms for rate-of-return carriers. NTCA, USTelecom and WTA said the FCC’s current 10 Mbps requirement…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
for broadband-oriented Connect America Fund support “risks locking rural America into lower service levels” contrary to statutory mandates, including that USF ensure “reasonably comparable” rural services at “reasonably comparable" prices. “This is particularly true when one considers that the networks that the USF program enables require planning years in advance and then have life cycles measured in decades once built,” the associations said in a filing posted Tuesday in docket 10-90. “The Associations propose to tether more closely the applicable USF broadband speed objectives to the Commission’s Section 706 broadband speed objectives.” But the groups said they understood the USF budget may not provide enough support for rural carriers to always meet the FCC’s current 25/3 Mbps wireline broadband definition under Section 706 of the Telecom Act. So they suggested some flexibility be built into proposed USF reforms to change existing mechanisms to cover broadband while giving carriers the option of receiving support based on a broadband cost model. For carriers not electing model-based support, the associations proposed they be required to deliver 25/3 Mbps service (or any new Section 706 definition) upon receiving a “reasonable request,” which the FCC interprets as generating sufficient anticipated revenue to justify the upgrades. If a rural telco can’t offer at least 25/3 Mbps, it would be required to offer 10/1 Mbps if feasible or 4 Mbps/768 Kbps if only that level of service is feasible, they suggested. For carriers electing the model-based approach, the groups would keep a 10/1 Mbps broadband requirement covering increasing percentages of customer locations over time, but with a duty to report how many locations are receiving 25/3 Mbps service, they proposed.