Cox Again Calls for AT&T/DirecTV Conditions
Cox Communications is repeating its push for substantial conditions on AT&T's planned buy of DirecTV. The cable company said a combined company would mean "substantial dangers ... to competition for bundled video, voice, and data services." In an ex parte…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
notice posted Friday in docket 14-90, Cox repeated and elaborated on several objections to the proposed deal and proposed regulatory steps to fix them, including that all video services offered by AT&T/DirecTV should be subject to Communications Act Section 628 rules, and requiring that AT&T/DirecTV use its own wiring -- not another provider's -- in any multidwelling unit it serves, or that it take steps to ensure it doesn't somehow interfere with a competitor's broadband service on that wiring infrastructure. AT&T/DirecTV will mean higher programming costs for smaller operators like Cox, as programmers raise prices on them to make up for the volume discounts a larger player like AT&T/DirecTV will be able to command, Cox said, repeating its request the FCC to limit those volume discounts as well to limit any exclusive programming contracts of AT&T/DirecTV. AT&T and DirecTV previously called some of the proposed conditions being put forward by deal critics “self-serving demands ... designed only to advance unrelated business interests" (see 1505270049">1505270049).