LECs Press FCC Not to Wait for Court on IntraMTA Fight; Verizon Makes IXC Case

officials said the commission shouldn't wait for a U.S. District Court in Dallas to resolve litigation arising from the dispute, which is "creating massive and unnecessary uncertainty for the entire industry," the filing said. LECs say interexchange carriers (IXCs) should pay long-distance access charges for intraMTA traffic, but Sprint and Verizon say they're liable only for local reciprocal compensation, which involves lower costs (see 1505190056). The court won't hear oral arguments on LEC motions to dismiss IXC lawsuits making financial claims until September or October, with "no assurance of a prompt ruling" this year, the filing said. "With IXC withholdings continuing month after month, time is of the essence," the filing said. Meanwhile, Verizon officials told FCC officials recently there was no exception to an FCC intraMTA wireless traffic rule requiring reciprocal compensation payments when that traffic is carried by an intermediary carrier, such as an IXC, according to an ex parte filing on phone conversations they had. "The intraMTA rule says reciprocal compensation applies to wireless intraMTA traffic, and the Commission rejected the argument that access charges apply if intraMTA wireless traffic is routed through an intermediary interexchange carrier," the Verizon filing said. "We also said that it would have made no sense for the Commission to set a separate, higher, intercarrier compensation rate for some — but not all — intraMTA traffic at the same time the Commission put in a place a new intercarrier compensation system expressly designed to harmonize and reduce rates."