FCC Opposes Supreme Court Review of Payphones Case
The Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit correctly said the FCC didn't act “arbitrarily or capriciously" in permitting state regulators to decide not to grant payphone service providers refunds from AT&T and Verizon (see 1406160029), wrote agency attorneys and…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
U.S. Solicitor General Donald Verrilli. They said the Supreme Court should deny a Nov. 10 writ of certiorari filed by the Illinois Public Telecommunications Association. “The court of appeals correctly upheld the FCC’s determination that state authorities were better positioned than the federal agency to decide the applicability of the filed-rate doctrine in individual refund disputes,” said the Feb. 11 brief released Wednesday.