Trade-Related Court Cases Filed for Week of Feb. 2-8
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of Feb. 2-8:
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
ADC Telecommunications on the classification of value added modules, including wavelength division multiplexers, passive optical splitter modules and monitor modules. CBP classified the merchandise under subheading 9013.80.9000 (4.5%). ADC says it should have instead been classified under subheading 8517.62.0050 (free). #15-00032. Filed Feb.2.
Danze Inc. on the classification of ADA-compliant toilet bowls and tanks. CBP classified the merchandise under subheading 6910.10.0010 (5.8%). Danze says it should have instead been classified under subheading 9817.00.96 (free). #15-00033. Filed Feb. 3.
Appeals of CIT Decisions
No appeals of Court of International Trade decisions were filed at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit during the week of Feb. 2-8.