Trade Law Daily is a Warren News publication.

FCC NPRM Not Doable Alternative to 911 Location Accuracy Road Map, Verizon Says

Rules proposed by the FCC in February aren't a viable alternative to the wireless location accuracy road map proposed by the four major carriers, APCO and the National Emergency Number Association last month, said Verizon in reply comments posted in…

Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article

Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.

docket 07-114 Monday. Comments were due last week at the FCC (see 1412230037), and some were made public Monday. “Many Roadmap opponents erroneously presume that the NPRM’s proposed rules are technically feasible, contrary to the rulemaking record, and object to the Roadmap simply on the basis that it departs from the NPRM,” Verizon said. The carrier cautioned the FCC not to make major changes to the consensus proposal. “The Roadmap is an integrated combination of enforceable milestones that balances multiple public interest objectives, and supplementing or modifying it will undermine that careful balance,” the carrier said. T-Mobile offered a similar take in its reply comments. “The Roadmap sets into motion the necessary steps to implement and deploy a true dispatchable location solution -- something not one of the Roadmap’s critics has attempted to do and for which none of them has a proposed alternative,” T-Mobile said. NENA also urged adoption of the road map. “The record in this proceeding is replete with references to new technologies that can and will bring significant improvements to wireless location accuracy,” NENA said. “But to suggest that these benefits can somehow magically accrue to the installed base is, at best, disingenuous and, at worst, intentionally misleading.”