US Dairy Producers Rail Against Geographical Indications in EU, Canada Pact
The geographical indication (GI) provisions in the European Union-Canada free trade agreement are likely to restrict Canadian market access for American cheeses, said three U.S. dairy groups in a Sept. 29 statement. Canada and the EU published the text of…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
the agreement on Sept. 26 (here). In contrast to Canadian intellectual property laws, the pact gives “automatic protection” for EU producers to exclusively use “asiago,” “feta,” “fontina,” “gorgonzola” and “munster,” said the statement. “The automatic protection for five cheese names that are generic in Canada, the U.S. and globally is another example of the EU’s overreach on geographical indications,” said Clay Hough, senior group vice president of the International Dairy Foods Association. “The EU’s GI strategy is incompatible with the fundamental goal of a trade negotiation, which is to remove trade barriers — not add them — and allow for greater competition.” U.S. industry leaders and lawmakers have repeatedly criticized the EU for its GI policies, calling for the Obama administration to address the issue in Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership negotiations (see 14061128).