Trade Law Daily is a Warren News publication.

Trade-Related Court Cases Filed for Week of Aug. 25-31

The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of Aug. 25-31:

Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article

Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.

  • Starkist Co. challenging CBP's denial of protests on the classification of its prepared tuna products. CBP classified the products in subheading 1604.14.10 (35%). Starkist says the prepared tuna products should have been classified in subheadings 1604.14.22 (in quota, 6%) and 1604.14.30 (ex quota, 12.5%). Summons filed Aug. 25. Court number 14-00197.
  • Janssen Ortho challenging CBP's denial of protests on the classification of its darunavir ethanolate. CBP classified it under subheading 2935.00.9500 (6.5%). Citing a CBP ruling, Janssen Ortho says it should have been classified under subheadings 3003.90.0000, K2935.00.6000, and K2935.00.9500 (free). Summons filed Aug. 26.Court number 14-00198.
  • Whirlpool Corporation challenging a Commerce Department scope ruling finding its kitchen appliance door handles are subject to antidumping and countervailing duties on aluminum extrusions from China. Complaint filed Aug. 26.Court number 14-00199.
  • PF Stores challenging the Commerce Department's liquidation instructions related to antidumping duties on wooden bedroom furniture from China. Complaint filed Aug. 26.Court number 14-00200.
  • U.S. Steel challenging the Commerce Department's final negative antidumping duty determination oil country tubular goods from Saudi Arabia. Complaint filed Aug. 26.Court number 14-00201.
  • CC Metals and Alloys (CCMA) and Globe Specialty Metals challenging the Commerce Department's final negative antidumping duty determination on ferrosilicon from Russia. Summons filed Aug. 29.Court number 14-00202.
  • Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Limited challenging the Commerce Department's final results of countervailing duty administrative review on multilayered wood flooring from China. Summons filed Aug. 29.Court number 14-00203.

The following appeals of Court of International Trade decisions were filed at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit during the week of Aug. 25-31:

  • Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret appealing a CIT decision related to the final results of an administrative review on circular welded carbon steel pipe and tube from Turkey. Filed Aug. 25. Court number 14-1744.
  • Jacobi Carbons appealing a CIT decision on the final results of an antidumping duty administrative review on activated carbon from China. Court numbers 14-1752, -1753, -1754, and -1756.
  • JBF RAK appealing a CIT decision on an antidumping duty administrative review on polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film, sheet and strip from the United Arab Emirates. Filed Aug. 28. Court number 14-1774.