Congressional Republicans began raising concerns about the FCC’s...
Congressional Republicans began raising concerns about the FCC’s Friday E-rate vote, focusing primarily on the financing of any E-rate overhaul. “Since Chairman [Tom] Wheeler first announced his $5 billion Wi-Fi stimulus proposal, I have been concerned that he cannot realistically…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
expect to pay for it without forcing Americans to pay more for communications services or diverting E-Rate funds that support necessary connectivity in our nation’s schools, particularly in rural areas,” said Senate Commerce Committee ranking member John Thune, R-S.D., in a statement Wednesday night. He also suggested that if Wheeler lacks bipartisan backing on the commission, Wheeler should postpone the vote. “Moving forward in a partisan manner, relying on untested budget assumptions, and shifting E-Rate’s priority from connectivity to Wi-Fi will only erode the Chairman’s and FCC’s stature, and potentially jeopardize support for E-Rate,” Thune said. House Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton, R-Mich., and Communications Subcommittee Chairman Greg Walden, R-Ore., sent a joint letter (http://1.usa.gov/U5xsq1) to Wheeler Thursday questioning the math that Wheeler has said will be used to pay for the E-rate expansion. Upton and Walden support the described approach but worry about “discrepancies” and the plan’s sustainability as well as “press reports that you have promised to increase the E-rate budget in the ‘near term,'” they said. There are also procedural “red flags” on bipartisan deliberation, they added. Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., sent Wheeler a letter Wednesday raising her concerns about broader USF equity among the states. Real E-rate overhaul “means simplifying the process by reducing the paperwork needed to apply for funding” and “distributing aid to schools on a more equitable per-student basis (rather than the complex discount formula that the program now uses),” Ayotte said. “Moreover, this means giving schools the flexibility to spend E-Rate funds on technologies that directly benefit students, instead of a complicated system of technology priorities dictated by Washington.” Do not increase the size of the E-rate budget without these changes, she cautioned.