No TPA Will Hamper Trade Negotiations, Says Chicago Tribune
Foreign trade partners have “little incentive” to negotiate with U.S. officials until Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) fast-track voting mechanisms are in place, said a Feb. 18 Chicago Tribune editorial. Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., recently sided with Senate Majority Leader Harry…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
Reid, D-Nev., in opposing the legislation, according to the Tribune (here). The fast-track mechanisms largely exclude Congress from the table by preventing the amendment process, said Durbin. “But that argument holds no water. In deciding what to demand in a trade deal, the administration will have to keep in mind what Congress wants -- and what it won't tolerate. Members and their concerns figure prominently in decisions about how to shape a deal. The White House knows that if it ignores the concerns of Congress, any pact would be dead on arrival,” said the editorial. “The real reason for blocking TPA is that doing so allows lawmakers to kill the talks without seeming to reject trade outright. A lot of Democrats in Congress are hostile to the idea of free trade, which organized labor has long resisted. A battle to get the bill through Congress would divide the party and present risks at the polls this November.”