Solar Company Proposes End to U.S.-China Standoff Through AD/CV Duty Elimination
The Chinese government should agree to end its antidumping and countervailing duty investigations on U.S. polysilicon exports to China as part of a Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA)-sponsored proposal to end an on-going U.S.-China solar industry dispute, the SEIA said on Sept. 23. The Chinese government officially imposed the AD/CV duties on Sept. 20 (see 13091918). The proposal is based on the precedent set in the U.S.-Brazilian cotton subsidy dispute that the WTO awarded Brazil retaliation privileges, the SEIA said (see 10061828). The proposal would also include the following:
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
- China would agree to remove the threat of artificial cost increases in a key raw material in the solar value chain, benefiting not just Chinese solar companies but all users of solar energy.
- Chinese companies would agree to create a fund that would benefit U.S. solar manufacturers directly and help to grow the U.S. market. Money for the fund would come from a percentage of the price premium Chinese companies are currently paying to third-country cell producers to get around U.S. trade sanctions, reducing costs and supply chain distortion for Chinese companies.
- In return, the U.S. antidumping and countervailing duties orders would be phased out.
- The proposal also calls for a safeguard mechanism designed to offset any surge of Chinese solar modules into the U.S. market.
Senators Max Baucus, D-Mont., and Jon Tester, D-Mont., endorsed the SEIA proposal in a joint Sept. 24 press statement.“This dispute has had a harmful effect on jobs in the U.S. and undercut our competitiveness in critical high-tech industries,” said the statement (here). “The best outcome for workers, manufacturers and consumers in Montana and across the country is to negotiate a settlement and bring the dispute to a close.”