The Telecom Act “succeeded in what it was...
The Telecom Act “succeeded in what it was designed to achieve,” but lately it’s been causing the FCC to struggle as the agency tries to “shoehorn” Internet technology into legacy regulations based on legacy regulation, said Craig Silliman, Verizon senior…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
vice president-public policy. Despite the 1996 update, “most of the fundamental concepts” from an earlier time were carried forward, he said: The “DNA” of the law is “railroad regulation from the 1880s.” The industry can’t expect Congress to update legislation at the pace of technological change, he said at a Media Institute luncheon Thursday. “The answer is to move away from large technology-specific legislative set pieces, and focus on a “technology agnostic” framework that puts consumer protection at its center.” The FCC should take a “strategic” view of policymaking, he said, with four core objectives: protecting consumers, encouraging innovation, encouraging investment and being technology-agnostic. People in the private sector aren’t smarter than government officials, he said. “The benefit of the private sector is that 1,000 groups can try 1,000 solutions.” In contrast, he said, “government only gets one chance to get it right.” Silliman is “realistic” about how long it will take to rewrite the law. It won’t come during this Congress, but it’s “possible” there might be a new Telecom Act in four to eight years, he said. There’s an “increasing tension,” he said, between a regulatory and legislative infrastructure that “no longer corresponds” with the technology that’s rolling out.