@font-face { font-family: “Times New Roman”;...
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal { margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: “Times New Roman”; }table.MsoNormalTable { font-size: 10pt; font-family: “Times New Roman”; }div.Section1 { page: SecThe National Rural Telecommunications Cooperative said it still has objections on the part of…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
its members to a waiver sought by PTC-220 so it can implement positive train control (CD April 25 p 11). The NRTC’s reply comments were posted by the FCC Thursday. “NRTC does not dispute the public interest benefits of PTC or that the 220-222 MHz band is well-suited for PTC,” the filing said (http://bit.ly/ZwEOnk). “NRTC also recognizes the crucial role PTC plays in improving the safety and reliability of rail operations and has supported efforts to develop the band for PTC. As described in its Comments, however, NRTC’s concern is to ensure that non-PTC-220 licensees in the 220-222 MHz band are not unfairly disadvantaged by relief granted to a single licensee, PTC-220, through the waiver process. PTC-220’s waiver would undermine the fundamental purpose of the 220-222 MHz band plan.”