@font-face { font-family: “Times New Roman”;...
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal { margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: “Times New Roman”; }a:link, span.MsoHyperlink { color: blue; text-decoration: underline; }a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed { color: purple; text-decoration: underline; }table.MsoNormalTable { font-size: 10pt; font-family: “Times New Roman”; }p.Default, li.Default, div.Default…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
{ margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: “Times New Roman”; color: black; }div.Section1 { page: Section1; }If wireless carriers are furnishing service on an unsubsidized basis in a service area, incumbent price-cap carriers shouldn’t be able to get Connect America Fund Phase II support for the area, U.S. Cellular said in FCC comments (http://bit.ly/17f2mMe). “This rule would advance the interests of consumers and protect and enhance competition,” the carrier said. “Such a rule would be consistent with other policies the Commission has proposed for disbursing CAF Phase II support. ... As the Commission has previously determined, a rule enabling mobile wireless carriers to be treated as unsubsidized competitors would advance the interests of consumers and protect and enhance competition by ensuring that the unsubsidized carriers will not face competitors whose services in the same area are subsidized by CAF Phase II support.”