Trade Law Daily is a Warren News publication.

CIT Stays Dongbu Case on Zeroing in AD Reviews Pending Ruling on Union Steel Appeal

The Court of International Trade stayed yet another court proceeding involving zeroing, pending a ruling on the Union Steel case by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The stayed proceeding, Dongbu v. U.S., awaits a remand order from CIT on how to implement the appeals court’s 2011 ruling, which marked the first time a court asked the International Trade Administration for an explanation of its policy to use zeroing in administrative reviews but not investigations. At issue is the scope of the remand, as well as whether Dongbu can continue to participate in the proceeding, given that it didn’t participate in the appeal to CAFC. CIT declined to decide either issue, because the appeals court’s ruling in Union Steel could control the outcome of this case.

Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article

Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.

(See 11040408 for summary of CAFC’s 2011 ruling in Dongbu, and 12030543 for summary of CIT’s decision in Union Steel, which is currently on appeal.)

(Union Steel Manufacturing Co., Ltd. v. United States, Slip Op. 13-33, dated 03/18/13, Judge Ridgway)