T-Mobile doesn’t feel there’s any need for a hearing in...
T-Mobile doesn’t feel there’s any need for a hearing in what it calls a “moot” complaint proceeding before the California Public Utilities Commission. Sherman Oaks, Calif., resident Barbara Jerey complained of disputed bill charges “caused by negligence and error of…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
the company” in a Nov. 26 filing (http://xrl.us/bn8ox9). She slammed the “defective” equipment she received and disputed “the validity of this debt in full,” she wrote. T-Mobile replied in a filing posted Friday (http://xrl.us/bn8oyd) that Jerey failed to pay her bills and terminated her accounts earlier this year. “The complaint should be dismissed with prejudice on that basis alone,” T-Mobile said. However, it provided a courtesy credit of $494.49 and $132.20, covering Jerey’s outstanding balances, on Dec. 6, it said, further eliminating the need for any hearings. Jerey “does not seem to identify any specific relief sought in her complaint,” T-Mobile added.