AT&T confronted two Texan cities over complaints in filings before...
AT&T confronted two Texan cities over complaints in filings before the Texas Public Utility Commission Wednesday. The city of Pharr is closing its complaint after receiving “full and final settlement of the complaint” of alleged overbilling, according to an agreed…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
motion of the parties to dismiss (http://xrl.us/bntojw). Houston also complained of AT&T’s service earlier this year and continues in its proceeding. Houston sought to disqualify the administrative law judge presiding over that case in mid-September because the PUC’s administrative law judges (ALJs) “have ruled inconsistently, in ways inconsistent with prior rulings and Commission rules, and that these ALJs appear to tend to favor utilities and Commission Staff over complainants,” Houston alleged Sept. 18 (http://xrl.us/bntoqu). The PUC denied this attempt Sept. 26. Houston appealed the PUC’s decision Oct. 4 and on Wednesday, AT&T urged the PUC to deny Houston’s appeal because it’s “not the proper motion for the relief sought and, alternatively, Houston’s Motion to Disqualify fails procedurally,” according to the filing.