Budget Prepay filed a complaint against AT&T asserting that AT&T...
Budget Prepay filed a complaint against AT&T asserting that AT&T violated its interconnection agreement with Budget in North Carolina. AT&T “unilaterally restricted the Bundled Promotions from resale, contrary to the Interconnection Agreement between AT&T and Budget and applicable law,” the…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
Tuesday filing before the North Carolina Utilities Commission said (http://xrl.us/bnnm2b). “AT&T’s actions are preferential, discriminatory and anti-competitive as AT&T seeks to impair competition, enhance its competitive position, and gain a competitive advantage through inappropriate intracorporate transaction and/or tying arrangement with its long distance company.” Budget wants the commission to issue a ruling that forces AT&T to offer its bundles for resale to Budget, declares AT&T’s restriction unlawful and to render payment to Budget all the money it believes it was owed plus interest over the last two years, the company said. AT&T declined to comment.