Cox Communications opposed a telco’s USF waiver request. Accipiter Communications’ FCC...
Cox Communications opposed a telco’s USF waiver request. Accipiter Communications’ FCC petition (CD June 4 p5) “relies heavily on its inaccurate account of the facts involving” the telco’s “efforts to provide service in Vistancia, a subdivision in Peoria,” Ariz., which…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
Cox serves, the cable operator said. “Accipiter also fails to meet the requirements for a waiver or to demonstrate that a taking will occur unless a waiver is granted.” Cox said in a filing posted Wednesday to docket 10-90 (http://xrl.us/bna5dz) that it’s “been subject to multiple attacks by Accipiter in Commission proceedings, starting in late 2010."