A Connecticut cable bill, SB-448, might not advance because the state’s...
A Connecticut cable bill, SB-448, might not advance because the state’s legislative session is over in a week, bill sponsor Sen. Christopher Wright (D) said. If that’s the case, Wright plans to bring it back next year, he said. The…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
bill would require cable providers to offer customers an option to buy any equipment for which they charge a monthly fee, and to require that each company clearly identify pricing options on its website. The bill would open the cable market up to innovation, Wright said. The bill passed out of the Energy and Technology Committee unanimously and is now being analyzed by the fiscal analysis office.