The FCC Wireless Bureau extended until May 14 the deadline...
The FCC Wireless Bureau extended until May 14 the deadline for filing reply comments on a NextG Networks of California petition asking the agency to clarify that the service NextG provides using distributed antenna systems and other small-cell solutions is…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
not CMRS, as defined by the Communications Act. NextG is in a dispute with Scottsdale, Ariz., on how its facilities should be classified. Replies were due May 2. Crown Castle, which is acquiring NextG, asked for the delay, the bureau said (http://xrl.us/bm4dir). “Crown Castle argues that prior to closing the transaction it is not in a position to review the details of NextG’s Distributed Antenna System (DAS) facilities, nor the manner in which they are regulated."