CAFC Affirms ITC Civil Penalties Against Ninestar for Section 337 Violations
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has affirmed the International Trade Commission’s assessment of civil penalties against Ninestar1 for failure to comply with cease and desist orders and a consent order2 issued in the original investigation of certain ink cartridges and components thereof (337-TA-565).
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
(In October 2007, pursuant to an investigation based on a complaint filed by Epson Portland, Inc. of Oregon; Epson America, Inc. of California; and Seiko Epson Corporation of Japan, ITC issued general and limited exclusion orders and cease and desist orders, directed against a number of respondents, against the importing, selling, marketing, advertising, distributing, offering for sale, transferring (except for exportation) in the U.S., and soliciting U.S. agents or distributors for, ink cartridges covered by claims of certain U.S. patents and directed to certain domestic respondents.
After issuance of these orders, Ninestar U.S. and Town Sky continued to import into the United States and to sell the ink cartridges that were the subject of the orders. An enforcement proceeding was brought and, upon investigation and hearing, the Administrative Law Judge determined that Ninestar was in violation of the cease and desist orders and a consent order, and levied a civil penalty.)
1Ninestar Technology Co., Ltd. (China); Ninestar Technology Company, Ltd. (Ninestar U.S.); Town Sky Inc. (collectively, Ninestar)
(See ITT’s Online Archives 07102620 for summary of ITC’s issuance of the orders.
See ITT’s Online Archives 09082125 for summary of ITC’s assessment of more than $21 million in civil penalties for violating the cease and desist orders and consent order, including a civil penalty of $11,110,000 against Ninestar.)
2According to ITC sources, the CAFC mistakenly states that ITC’s civil penalties against Ninestar were assessed for failure to comply with the exclusion and cease and desist orders.