The FCC must not forget rural areas as it seeks to...

policy adviser, said Congress has worked a long time on USF but “doesn’t seem to be getting it done.” The Senate had worked on the issue, but has shown less interest “the last couple of years,” he said. “The question is, what will the FCC do as it rethinks” USF and intercarrier compensation, “and will it pay as much attention as is necessary to avoid having a digital divide in the future with regard to advanced services?” Dorgan is “tinkering around with an op-ed piece” about USF overhaul discussing the “dramatic changes that have occurred since I've been in Congress and still the urgent need not only for universal service but intercarrier compensation funding” for small telcos in rural areas, he said. “I come from a town of 300 people, and so I've always been concerned that whatever happens … there needs to be an understanding of the buildout of advanced services and the financial capability to do that in the rural areas.” Most high-speed broadband buildout goes to “the biggest cities where there’s the largest income streams,” Dorgan said. But the original idea behind universal service was that a telephone in a rural area is just as important as one in an urban location, he said. “That concept has to continue through the development of these advanced services. Otherwise you will leave a lot of parts of the country behind economically.”