ITA's Use of Adverse AD Rates Gets Scrutiny in China Heavy Forged Hand Tools Remands
Following earlier court remands that questioned the International Trade Administration’s application of an adverse, China-wide rate of 139.31% to bars and wedges produced and exported by Tianjin Machinery Import and Export Corp. and Shandong Huarong Machinery Co., Ltd., a rate based on the highest margin calculated for Tianjin in a review five years earlier, the ITA repeatedly defended the high rate as tied to the case facts and warranted by the respondents’ participation in a fraudulent invoicing scheme. The Court of International Trade has now sustained the 139.31% rate for Tianjin. However, for bars and wedges produced and exported by Shandong Huarong, the court ordered the ITA to find a lesser adverse rate tied either to a single calculated rate in the period of review or to what the firm would have received had it cooperated, plus “a built-in increase as a deterrent to non-compliance” in either case.
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
With respect to the ITA’s assignment of a 98.77% adverse rate to Tianjin’s exports of picks/mattocks, the court also ordered to ITA to find a lower rate based on “commercial reality,” but again with a built-in increase as a deterrent to non-compliance. (Heavy hand tools from China include separate orders for axes/adzes; bars/wedges; hammers/sledges; and picks/mattocks.) (Slip-Op. 11-1, decided 01/04/11, public version posted subsequently.)